FREE LESSON · Reading Foundations
teach
Don't ask which option feels right, ask which option you can prove from the passage.
An inference is an idea you work out from clues, rather than something the passage states directly. Several options may feel reasonable. The Inference Grid helps you test them. Treat each option as a claim and find its proof line. Choose the claim with the most direct proof. Claims with no proof are traps.
Picture a two-column grid. On the left is the claim, what an option says is true. On the right is the proof, the exact words from the passage that show it. A strong inference has a short, direct line from claim to proof. A weak inference has an empty proof column, or a proof line that needs you to invent extra steps. When you make yourself fill the proof column for each option, the guessing stops and the evidence decides.
Words like 'suggests', 'implies' and 'most likely' ask you to work out an idea from clues. So do phrases like 'we can tell that' and 'the writer wants us to understand'. Take one careful step beyond the words, and point to the line that supports it. Choose the claim with the most direct proof.
Here is the method. Read the question and look at the options as claims. For each claim, hunt the passage for a proof line, the exact detail, action, or phrase that supports it. Write the claim and its proof side by side in your head. Now compare: which claim has a proof line you can point to directly? Which claims need you to add ideas the passage never gives? Choose the claim whose proof is closest to the words.
The most tempting wrong answer is the 'overreach claim'. It's a dramatic option that goes far past the proof. Its proof column is empty, or it needs a backstory the passage never gives. Two more traps: the 'half-proof claim', where a detail supports only part of the option, and the 'real-life-true claim'. This is true in life but not shown in the passage.
A solid answer sounds like this: 'We can work out ... because the passage shows ...'. State the claim, then give the proof line. For a stronger answer, connect two or three details that all point the same way. Show why the tempting option has no proof.
Quick checklist: read each option as a claim. Try to fill its proof column from the passage. Keep the claim with the most direct proof. Drop any claim whose proof column is empty or needs invented steps. If a claim sounds clever but you cannot point to its proof line, it is the trap, not the answer.
Claim
what an answer option says is true about the passage.Treat every option as a claim you must prove, not a feeling you trust.Proof line
the exact detail or phrase from the passage that supports a claim.A claim with no proof line is a trap, however reasonable it sounds.Inference Grid
pairing each claim with its proof line, side by side, to compare.Filling the proof column for each option turns guessing into evidence.Overreach claim
an option that goes further than the proof can support.Its proof column is empty or needs an invented backstory, drop it.Most direct proof
the proof line closest to the claim, needing the fewest steps.The best inference is the one you can prove with the least added thinking.The moveIn The Audition, place Dev's nervousness beside several physical clues. Then reject any explanation that needs a backstory the passage never gives.
show
Watch how to solve it, one step at a time.
Read the passage and the question, then follow the steps. You'll see the answer, the trap, and what to do next time.
Full passage: claims tested against proof
Question: The passage suggests that Dev was nervous about the audition. Which choice best shows this?The Audition
Dev arrived an hour early and sat in the empty corridor. He had practised the piece every night for a month, and he knew it the way he knew his own name. Still, he read the sheet music again, though he did not need to.
When the door opened, he stood too quickly and dropped his folder. The pages slid across the floor, and he gathered them without looking up. A girl beside him smiled and said it would be fine. Dev nodded and tried to smile back, but his mouth felt stiff.
Inside, the judges asked him to begin whenever he was ready. He set his hands on the keys and waited for them to stop shaking. Then, slowly, the first notes came, and the room grew quiet around them.
Work out what kind of answer you need.
The word 'suggests' tells me the passage never says 'Dev was nervous' outright. I must work it out from what he does. So I'll treat each option as a claim about how he feels. Then I'll look for the line that proves it most directly. The claim with the clearest action as proof wins.
Follow the steps from the clue words to the answer.
Look at the whole grid, not just the winning row.
See why a tempting answer is wrong.
Common wrong answer: Dev reading the sheet music again shows he was unprepared and did not know the piece.
Why students choose it: Reading the music again looks like a sign of not knowing it.
Why it is wrong: The passage says 'he knew it the way he knew his own name'. It also says 'he did not need to' read it again. His shaking hands show nerves, even though he knows the music.
Corrected reading: Dev was well prepared but nervous. The rereading and the shaking hands point to nerves, not a lack of practice.
Say the answer and the shortest proof.
We can work out that Dev was nervous about the audition because the passage shows it through his actions. The clearest proof is that he 'set his hands on the keys and waited for them to stop shaking'. His nerves also show when he 'stood too quickly and dropped his folder' and when his 'mouth felt stiff' as he tried to smile.
What to remember for questions like this.
The method is claim, then proof, then check, then strongest clue.
Here, shaking hands, the dropped folder and the stiff smile all point to nerves. The shaking hands are the strongest clue, because they happen at the key moment.
What to do on your next question.
| In this question | On the next question | Why it helps |
|---|---|---|
| Paired Dev's nervousness with shaking hands, a dropped folder and a stiff smile. | Write the inference as a claim, then collect two or three actions or words that point to it. | A pattern of independent clues is safer than an inference built from one ambiguous detail. |
| Ranked the shaking hands as the most direct proof. | Ask which evidence would be hardest to explain if the claim were false. | The most diagnostic clue should lead the answer, while weaker clues support it. |
| Rejected 'unprepared' because the passage says Dev knew the piece. | Give every tempting claim a proof column and a contradiction column. | An empty proof column or a direct contradiction rules out a likely-sounding inference. |
compare
The difference between a reasonable guess and a proven inference.
Both readers looked at the same passage. One picks the claim that sounds reasonable. The other keeps the claim whose proof line points straight at the words. Markers reward the second.
The whole response
Unproven claim
Mai kept reading her notes, which shows she was unprepared and didn't really know her speech.
Proven claim
Mai was nervous, shown most directly by gripping the stand until her knuckles turned white.
guide
Do one small reader move before independent practice.
Reread the worked passage and question. State a claim, then find its proof line. Check that no stronger proof points elsewhere before you answer on your own.
Read this line: 'She left her dinner untouched and kept watching the door.'
What might she be feeling? Pick one. Then give the action that proves it.
Want feedback on your own answer? Get started to practise with instant marking.
The Missing Folder
Lina reached the school hall before the science display opened. Her poster was already on its stand, but the folder containing her notes was missing. She checked the table twice and looked under the stand. When the caretaker arrived, Lina asked whether he had moved anything while cleaning. He pointed to a shelf behind the curtain, where he had placed three folders to keep them dry during the morning mopping. Lina thanked him, opened her folder and quietly rehearsed the first sentence of her talk. When the doors opened, she stood beside the poster with the notes in her hand.
Question: What is the best inference about Lina when she first notices the folder is missing?
The Missing Folder
Lina reached the school hall before the science display opened. Her poster was already on its stand, but the folder containing her notes was missing. She checked the table twice and looked under the stand. When the caretaker arrived, Lina asked whether he had moved anything while cleaning. He pointed to a shelf behind the curtain, where he had placed three folders to keep them dry during the morning mopping. Lina thanked him, opened her folder and quietly rehearsed the first sentence of her talk. When the doors opened, she stood beside the poster with the notes in her hand.
Question: Which detail best proves why the caretaker moved the folders?
Ask about this lesson or iClass